To that of
Mr Houldin's retirement in April 1911.
The question
to Fiske's application for
additional remuneration is
fully dealt with
in Para P
of the despatch of the 16. 5. 14.
I went on leave at the end of March 1905
and returned to duty
on
April 1904
Mr Fisher's complaint
doubtless dealt with
by my
predecessor,
The point which Mr. Fisher raises
with regard to the responsibility of the
architects for deficiencies
in the Bill of Quantities is dealt with in the despatch of the 16.5.14.
The large increase
in the capital cost
of works is fully explained in the statement which I presented in March 1911; vide
Para 3 of the despatch of the 31.12.17. I may point out that the original estimate
stated in the
conditions of competition
for building which would contain
special accommodation sprang
up in such Condition
out of clean I believe
o that of
+ y22 aktour bring only fiths afte
Mr Houthin's retirement in
The question
afril 1911. 41
to Fiske's affliction for
additional remuneration is
is fully
deal with
21543
54314 in farm 11
Paras P
"y
A.t. desfated of the 16. 5. 14.
I went on leve at the end of
Mared you a returned
and of March 1905.
afril 1904 0
to
to duty
Mr Fisher's compleant
March 1905 m
doubthas dealt with
by my
brum timens,
The point which Mr. Jisher raises
with regard to the refusibility of the
سمید
architects for deficiencies
the Bill of Suantities is dealt with in th: desfated of the 16.5.14.
210434 fars th
31891173
The large racin
in the cap
works in fully exflined in the statement which I prefered in More 1911; vide
میں
tral 3 of the desfated of the 31.12.17). dmy foot out that the riginal stat
I
the
stated in th
DO
the estimated
of Bon, on conditions of competition
cost f
سات
building which would contin
speises
the accommodation spriger
кора
in such Condition
ouitith clean I belive
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.